Tiering System

Infinuim Cosmosmology Tiering System:

Tier 11: Infinitesimal
- 11-C: Low Hypoverse
- 11-B: Hypoverse
- 11-A: High Hypoverse

Tier 10: Human
- 10-C: Below Avg. Human
- 10-B: Human
- 10-A: Athlete

Tier 9: Superhuman
- 9-C: Street
- 9-B: Wall
- 9-A: Small Building

Tier 8: Urban
- 8-C: Building
- Hi 8-C: Large Building
- 8-B: City Block
- 8-A: Multi-City Block

Tier 7: Nuclear
- Lo 7-C: Small Town
- 7-C: Town
- Hi 7-C: Large Town
- Lo 7-B: Small City
- 7-B: City
- 7-A: Mountain
- Hi 7-A: Large Mountain

Tier 6: Tectonic
- 6-C: Island
- Hi 6-C: Large Island
- Lo 6-B: Small Country
- 6-B: Country
- Hi 6-B: Large Country
- 6-A: Continent
- Hi 6-A: Multi-Continent¹

Tier 5: Planetary
- 5-C: Moon
- Lo 5-B: Small Planet
- 5-B: Planet
- 5-A: Large Planet
- Hi 5-A: Dwarf Star

Tier 4: Stellar
- Lo 4-C: Small Star
- 4-C: Star
- Hi 4-C: Large Star
- 4-B: Solar Sys.
- 4-A: Multi-Solar Sys.

Tier 3: Cosmic
- 3-C: Galaxy
- 3-B: Multi-Galaxy
- 3-A: Universe²
- Hi 3-A: High Universe³

Tier 2: Multiversal
- Lo 2-C: Universe+
- 2-C: Low Multiverse
- 2-B: Multiverse⁴
- 2-A: Multiverse+⁵

Tier 1: Extradimensional
- Lo 1-C: Low Complex Multiverse
- 1-C: Complex Multiverse⁶
- Hi 1-C: High Complex Multiverse⁷

+ additional Tiering

Tier 12/15: Extraverse/Omniversal/Transendental:
Tier 12: Hyperversal
- 12-C: Low Hyperversal: Entities at this level can manipulate spaces that encompass a vast range of dimensions, typically exceeding traditional concepts of space and reality.
- 12-B: Hyperversal: Characters or objects capable of affecting or creating structures within hyper-dimensional spaces, transcending conventional notions of spatial dimensions and realities.
- 12-A: High Hyperversal: Beings at this level possess the power to manipulate or exist within structures of incomprehensible complexity and scale, operating on a cosmic or multiversal level.

Tier 13: Outerversal
- 13-C: Low Outerversal: Entities capable of interacting with or affecting structures beyond the scope of traditional dimensional understanding, manipulating spaces of immense complexity and scale/all possible uncountables prior to the inaccessible cardinal (the cardinality of ℵ0-ℵ1+).
- 13-B: Outerversal: Characters or objects with the ability to manipulate or exist within structures that transcend conventional notions of space and reality, operating on a scale that defies traditional dimensional categorization⁸.
- 13-A: High Outerversal: Beings at this level possess the power to manipulate or exist within structures of incomprehensible complexity and scale, transcending conventional concepts of space, time, and reality/transcending the dualities of existence and embracing the unity of all things.⁹.

Tier 14: Extraverse
- 14-C: Low Extraverse: Entities capable of manipulating or existing within structures that extend beyond traditional conceptions of reality, operating on a scale that surpasses conventional dimensional categorization.
- 14-B: Extraverse: Characters or objects with the ability to affect or create structures that transcend traditional notions of space, time, and reality, operating on a scale that defies conventional understanding¹⁰.
- 14-A: High Extraverse: Beings at this level possess the power to manipulate or exist within structures of unfathomable complexity and scale, transcending conventional concepts of space, time, and reality.

Tier 15: Boundless¹¹
- 15-C: One Layer Into Boundless: Entities capable of interacting with or affecting structures that extend beyond traditional conceptions of reality, operating on a scale that surpasses conventional dimensional categorization.
- 15-B: Couple Layers Into Boundless: Characters or objects with the ability to manipulate or exist within structures that transcend traditional notions of space, time, and reality, operating on a scale that defies conventional understanding.
- 15-A: Several Layers Into Boundless: Beings at this level possess the power to manipulate or exist within structures of unfathomable complexity and scale, transcending conventional concepts of space, time, and reality.

Tier 16: Irrelevant Layers into Boundless
- 16-C: Infinite Layer Into Boundless: Entities capable of manipulating or existing within structures that extend beyond traditional conceptions of reality, operating on a scale that surpasses conventional dimensional categorization.
- 16-B: Immeasurable Layers Into Boundless: Characters or objects with the ability to affect or create structures that transcend traditional notions of space, time, and reality, operating on a scale that defies conventional understanding.
- 16-C: Irrelevant Layers Into Boundless: Beings at this level possess the power to manipulate or exist within structures of unfathomable complexity and scale, transcending conventional concepts of space, time, and reality.

The speed tiering:speed scale

Guidebooks

Platonism Guidebook: GRDSC PLATONISM GUIDEBOOK

Infinity and concepts GUIDEBOOK:Infinity And Concepts GUIDEBOOK (For Idiots)

Grdsc Dimensionality Guidebook: GRDSC Dimensionality Guidebook

Understanding Low Outerversal and High Outerversal:

Idiots Guide's to Outerversal

Professional Guide To Outerversal Tierings: Pro's Guide To Outerversal Tierings

GRDSC Hitcher's Guide to Canon, Authenticity, and Quality Writing: GRDSC Hitcher's Guide to Canon, Authenticity, and Quality Writing

Professional Guide to Understanding the Laws of Identity: Professional Guide to Understanding the Laws of Identity

Guidebook On Multiverse Theory And Outerversal Concepts: Guidebook On Multiverse Theory And Outerversal Concepts

Comprehensive Guidebook on Fallacies: Comprehensive Guidebook on Fallacies

Comprehensive Guidebook on Arguing and Evidence Citation: Comprehensive Guidebook on Arguing and Evidence Citation

Continuum Hypothesis Guidebook: Guidebook on the Continuum Hypothesis and Generalized Continuum Hypothesis: Outerversal Concepts and Justification

Multiversal Types Guidebook: Multiversal Types Guidebook

Paraconsistent logic Guidebook:

Paraconsistent Logic Guidebook

Cosmology Guidebooks:

Omnisphere Guidebook

---

Rules:

Do's:

1. Maintain Consistency: Ensure that each character's abilities and feats remain consistent with their assigned tier and established lore.

2. Stay Authentic: Represent each character accurately within the established tone, themes, and aesthetics of the GRDSC universe.

3. Encourage Collaboration: Foster collaboration among content creators to expand the character list and develop interconnected narratives.

4. Contribute to World-Building: Introduce new characters that inhabit various locations and organizations within the GRDSC universe to enrich the world-building efforts.

5. Comply with Canon: Ensure that character listings comply with established canon while allowing room for exploration and expansion.

Don'ts:

1. Avoid Contradictions: Refrain from introducing abilities or feats for characters that contradict established lore or previously established attributes.

2. Steer Clear of Inconsistencies: Avoid inconsistencies in characters' power levels, backgrounds, or interactions within the GRDSC universe.

3. Discourage Isolation: Avoid isolating characters from the larger GRDSC universe; instead, seek opportunities for characters to interact and contribute to the overarching narrative.

4. Resist Canon Violations: Refrain from violating established canon rules or guidelines when creating character listings.

5. Limit Clichés: Steer clear of clichéd character tropes or stereotypes that may detract from the authenticity of the GRDSC universe.

By adhering to these do's and don'ts, creators can ensure that character listings on the GRDSC wikidot maintain coherence, authenticity, and contribute positively to the overall storytelling experience within the GRDSC community.

+ But My argument/scaling is canon because it aligns with the Extended Canon Rules (GRDSC) 

But My argument/scaling is canon because it aligns with the Extended Canon Rules (GRDSC)
Certainly, if someone claims that their argument or scaling is canon because it aligns with the Extended Canon Rules (GRDSC), it's essential to address this claim while applying the dos and don'ts of power scaling and debating within the GRDSC universe.

Argument breakdown:

1. Why it goes against the canon rules:
- Disregarding Original Canon Consistency: While the Extended Canon Rules may introduce new concepts and expansions to the GRDSC universe, they should not be used to disregard or contradict the consistency established in the Original Canon. The dos emphasize respecting canon continuity, which includes both the Original and Extended Canon materials.

- Misinterpretation of Canon Updates: The claim may misinterpret or misrepresent updates or revisions to the canon rules and guidelines. The dos encourage understanding and incorporating these updates accurately, but they should not be used to justify arbitrary interpretations that deviate from the core principles of the GRDSC universe.

- Exclusion of Collaboration: By asserting that their argument/scaling based on the Extended Canon Rules is canon, the claim may inadvertently discourage collaboration and cross-referencing between members who draw from both the Original and Extended Canon materials. The dos emphasize the importance of collaborative efforts in enriching discussions and understanding the GRDSC universe comprehensively.

2. Applying the dos and don'ts:
- Respect Canon Consistency: The claim should be evaluated based on its adherence to the principle of respecting canon consistency across both the Original and Extended Canon Rules. If the argument deviates significantly from established lore or contradicts essential elements of the GRDSC universe, it may not align with this principle.

- Acknowledge Canon Updates: While the claim may draw from the Extended Canon Rules, it should also acknowledge updates or revisions to the canon and incorporate them accurately into the discussion. Ignoring or misinterpreting canon updates goes against the dos of understanding and adapting to changes in the GRDSC universe.

- Encourage Collaboration: It's essential to promote collaboration and inclusivity in discussions, even when participants draw from different sources within the GRDSC canon. Instead of asserting individual interpretations as absolute canon, participants should engage in constructive dialogue and mutual respect for diverse perspectives.

In summary, while arguments or scalings based on the Extended Canon Rules may offer valuable insights and expansions to the GRDSC universe, claiming absolute canon status based solely on this premise goes against the principles of respecting canon consistency, acknowledging updates, and encouraging collaboration outlined in the dos and don'ts of power scaling and debating within the GRDSC community.

+ But I made Saitama/Goku boundless in an article and its canon because it aligns with the Extended Canon Rules (GRDSC) 

In response to the claim that an article portrays Saitama or Goku becoming Boundless based on the Extended Canon Rules (GRDSC), several points can be made to address this assertion while adhering to the dos and don'ts of power scaling and debating within the GRDSC universe:

1. Respect Original Canon Consistency:
- The dos emphasize the importance of maintaining consistency with the Original Canon (GRDSC). While the Extended Canon Rules may introduce new concepts or expansions, they should not override or contradict the established lore and feats of characters like Saitama or Goku within the Original Canon.

2. Canon Updates and Interpretations:
- The dos encourage understanding and incorporating canon updates accurately. However, interpretations that significantly deviate from the core principles of the Original Canon should be carefully evaluated. Claiming that Saitama or Goku becomes Boundless may not align with the intent or spirit of their established feats and characterizations within the Original Canon.

3. Collaborative Approach:
- Instead of asserting individual interpretations as absolute canon, the dos promote collaboration and inclusivity in discussions. Participants should engage in constructive dialogue and mutual respect for diverse perspectives. Claiming absolute truth based solely on one interpretation of the Extended Canon Rules may discourage collaborative efforts and lead to division within the GRDSC community.

4. Canon Coherence and Plausibility:
- Assessing the plausibility and coherence of the claim within the broader context of the GRDSC universe is essential. Claims that characters like Saitama or Goku suddenly achieve Boundless status may lack sufficient narrative or thematic justification within the established lore. The dos encourage maintaining coherence and logical progression within character arcs and power scaling.

5. Encourage Exploration and Creativity:
- While the Extended Canon Rules provide opportunities for exploration and creativity, claims should still align with the fundamental principles and tone of the GRDSC universe. Participants should feel encouraged to expand upon existing concepts and narratives, but not at the expense of coherence or consistency with the Original Canon.

In conclusion, while articles based on the Extended Canon Rules may offer intriguing possibilities for character development and power scaling, claiming absolute canon status for interpretations that significantly deviate from the Original Canon requires careful consideration and adherence to the dos and don'ts of power scaling and debating within the GRDSC community.

Footnotes

1. Characters or objects that can destroy multiple continents or those who can easily harm characters with multi-continent level durability.

2. Characters or objects that can create or destroy all celestial bodies within a finite 3-D space at least equivalent in size to the observable universe via an omnidirectional explosion that covers the entire space, alternately create or significantly affect a 3-D universe or a pocket dimension of comparable size, which does not involve the destruction and/or creation of space-time.

3. Universes/Characters or objects that are capable of significantly affecting,[1] creating, and/or destroying an area of space qualitatively larger than an infinitely-sized 3-dimensional space. Common fictional examples of spaces representing such sizes are space-time continuums (the entire past, present and future of 3-dimensional space) of a universal scale. However, it can be more generally fulfilled by any 4-dimensional space that is either:

A) Equivalent to a large extra dimensional space. That is, a higher-dimensional "bulk" space which embeds lower-dimensional ones (Such as our universe) as subsets of itself, whose dimensions are not microscopic / compactified.

B) Portrayed as completely transcending lower-dimensional objects and spaces in the setting of a given work of fiction. example: said universe is infinite in sixe therefore high uni or ∞ in 3d+ terminology

4. Characters or objects that can significantly affect,[1] create and/or destroy larger multiverses which comprise from 1001 to any higher finite amount of separate space-time continuums. or baseline 4d in ap/dp

5. Characters or objects that are capable of significantly affecting,[1] creating and/or destroying a countably infinite number of separate space-time continuums.

6. Characters or objects that can universally affect, create and/or destroy spaces whose size corresponds to three to five higher levels of infinity greater than a standard universal model. In terms of "dimensional" scale, this can be equated to 7 and 9-dimensional real coordinate spaces (R ^ 7 to R ^ 9)

7. Characters or objects that can universally affect, create and/or destroy spaces whose size corresponds to six to seven higher levels of infinity greater than a standard universal model. In terms of "dimensional" scale, this can be equated to 10 and 11-dimensional real coordinate spaces (R ^ 10 to R ^ 11)

8. capable of destorying a infinite outerversal realm they would scale to outerversal because if its a finite infinite outerversal realm or simplying aleph-0 to aleph 1 then thats outerversal/ surpasses conventional mathematical notation, with its size exceeding the cardinality of ℵ2-ℵ3+ .ℵ0 (aleph-zero, also aleph-nought or aleph-null) is the cardinality of the set of all natural numbers, and is an infinite cardinal. The set of all finite ordinals, called ω or ω0 (where ω is the lowercase Greek letter omega), has cardinality ℵ0. A set has cardinality ℵ0 if and only if it is countably infinite, that is, there is a bijection (one-to-one correspondence) between it and the natural numbers. Examples of such sets are:

the set of natural numbers, irrespective of including or excluding zero,
the set of all integers,
any infinite subset of the integers, such as the set of all square numbers or the set of all prime numbers,
the set of all rational numbers,
the set of all constructible numbers (in the geometric sense),
the set of all algebraic numbers,
the set of all computable numbers,
the set of all computable functions,
the set of all binary strings of finite length, and
the set of all finite subsets of any given countably infinite set.
as outerversal is the defined cardinal numbers

9. In set theory, an uncountable cardinal is inaccessible if it cannot be obtained from smaller cardinals by the usual operations of cardinal arithmetic. in vsbw this is high outer

10. Characters who can significantly affect things which would have their "size" expressed as infinity on a scale where 1 is baseline Outerverse level and 2 is baseline High Outerverse level. Like with High Hyperversal, this tier extends outward to any number beyond countable infinity, and in rare cases it may even expand past the point where the aforementioned analogy is not enough to convey the full scope of the character/structure.

11. Characters or objects that can affect structures which completely exceed the logical foundations of High 1-A, much like it exceeds the ones defining Outerversal and below, meaning that all possible levels of High Outerversal are exceeded, even an infinite or uncountably amount of such levels. This tier has no endpoint, and can be extended to any higher level just like the ones above.

Being "omnipotent" or any similar reasoning is not nearly enough to reach this tier on its own; however, such statements can be used as supporting evidence in conjunction with more substantial information.